Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Apr 19, 2020, at 1:19 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I must say that Webex was an emergency solution for the Covid-19 situation for an on-line meeting instead of the Vancouver one (our usual tool for that is Meetecho, but probably it was not obvious if it can support so many participants, and not designed for not having a "local" venue).

I agree that the tools we use should be IPv6-capable. I'm doing work in ICANN and ITU, and by the way stay in touch with family using IP-based A/V. What I'm using is Zoom, which is IPv6-capable. They have had some widely-publicized security issues lately, which as near as I can tell are resolved if one places a password on a scheduled meeting, and possibly forces the moderator to manually accept each attendee on the assumption that they know them. There remain a couple of issues - limits on the number of attendees, and a 40 minute time limit. Both of those can be overcome at a cost of $12/month.

I have never recorded a call, but I think it can be done.

Zoom is IPv6-capable, and with a small amount of common sense the known issues can be overcome as far as I know. I'd be willing for my working group to use my zoom account for its meetings...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux