Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Apr 18, 2020, at 12:34 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Apr 17, 2020, at 18:23, Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> As for well-defined criteria for deciding when it's safe to meet again, I suggest (as a strawman proposal):
> 
> It doesn’t matter what you propose. No one at IETF should make up the rules on when it safe to meet again. We are not health care or pandemic experts.

That’s fine, and I certainly agree in a sense.  But who is really in a position to say when both meetings and international travel from all over the world, are safe?   And for that matter who is both globally knowledgeable and trustworthy enough to rely on?  

Keith






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux