Re: [Last-Call] [Taps] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Apr 16, 2020, at 9:55 AM, Susan Hares <shares@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Joe: 
> 
> I have come to the same conclusion that an open-source TCP-AO is the next
> step for TCP-AO.
> 
> I still hoping for some fairy dust ... to fix the BGP TCP security problem. 
> If you have any ... let me know 


We have a fix for the security problem. What we lack is a fix for the freeloader problem. 

Other than declaring TCP MD5 a hazard and actively abandoning it, there’s too much of a fallback.

One step might be for the IETF to prohibit support for TCP MD5 in all new work - e.g., there’s pending work in TCPM to develop a YANG model that includes MD5 “for legacy support”, but that only serves to feed the problem. 

But a new solution isn’t going to make freeloading easier.

Joe

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux