Re: [Last-Call] [Taps] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joe: 

I have come to the same conclusion that an open-source TCP-AO is the next
step for TCP-AO.

I still hoping for some fairy dust ... to fix the BGP TCP security problem. 
If you have any ... let me know 

Susan Hares


-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Touch [mailto:touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 11:32 AM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: ops-dir@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx;
draft-ietf-taps-transport-security.all@xxxxxxxx; taps@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Taps] Opsdir telechat review of
draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11

Hi, Susan,

> On Apr 16, 2020, at 3:35 AM, Susan Hares via Datatracker
<noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Susan Hares
> ...
> Personal plea: 
> You've clear stated the BGP issue up front. 
> TCP MD5 is bad (due to privacy issues) and TCP-AO is not deployed..

It is available in Cisco IOS at least. Its biggest drawback appears to be a
lack of open-source implementations.

>  Has the TAPs given any thought to
> what might be  a replacement that could utilize some of the modern 
> TCP.

Given the problem with TCP-AO deployment is that there is no free
implementation and low implementation by vendors, how exactly would a new
solution with even less implemented code help?

Joe

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux