| Jouni, thanks for your review. Mark, thanks for addressing the comments. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa On Mar 9, 2020, at 7:38 PM, Mark Nottingham < mnot@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Jouni,Thanks for the review. Responses below.On 9 Mar 2020, at 7:19 am, Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-nottingham-how-did-that-get-into-the-repo-??
Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review Date: 2020-03-08
IETF LC End Date: 2020-03-12
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
Summary:
This very needed document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC with
few minor nits.
Major issues:
None.
Minor issues:
1) Line 116-117 states "This document uses ABNF [RFC5234], including by
reference the following rules: ALPHA, DIGIT." Why RFC5234 APLHA and DIGIT
rules need to be specifically called out?
Good question; I suspect that's from an earlier revision. Removed.Nits/editorial comments:
1) Line 106 s/ike/like
2) Line 106 Expand CSRF on the first use (and possibly give an informative
reference to it).
Fixed in source, thanks!--Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/_______________________________________________Gen-art mailing listGen-art@xxxxxxxxhttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
|
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
