Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet standards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In article <68ab4f9e057d49b0972f97a907f45ced@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> you write:
>The issue is, when government representative participate to IETF (or a RIR, or ICANN, or a NOG), they do
>so in their official capacity, thus representing to some extent their organisation. They (we) do
>understand the concept, however it is impossible to attend without this sort of "official" hat. So on one
>hand there is Joe-as-himself, and on the other hand there in Alice-as-a-whole-government-rep. How do we
>make this work better for everyone's benefit in IETF?

When Alice heads for the conference she may be a government rep, but
when she arrives and gets her badge, she's Alice who happens to work
for the Ministry of whatever.  Lots of people from governments come to
IETF meetings and work this way.  Just this afternoon we had a very
interesting discussion in the security displatch group in which
someone who works for the UK government presented a draft she had
co-written, people made comments and figured out how it could progress
in relation with other IETF work.

This is only a problem if you think it is.  We know it's not an inherent
problem since people from many governments have productively worked with
the IETF for a long time.

R's,
John




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux