On 26 Mar 2020, at 10:01, Stewart Bryant wrote:
What worries me is how someone that has not been to a IETF a few times
can be I a position to understand how it works and the nuances of the
information that are presented. Also in person presence shows a level
of commitment to the organisation which is essential to fulfil the
Nomcom duties.
The criteria were set for a reason and we should abide by that
rationale. For that reason I would prefer that the criteria be
remained at three recent physical meetings as it currently is.
If, as is likely, we end up with a virtual meeting in Summer we can
think again, but for now we should stick with the original criteria of
3/5 in person meetings.
This seems to me to be more about the general eligibility issue being
discussed on eligibility-discuss, as opposed to the stop-gap that is
being proposed for the 2020-2021 NomCom, which is affected by 107 in the
next few months.
pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best
