Re: Forced virtual IETF 109 as well as 107

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alex,
At 02:05 PM 15-03-2020, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
What do you mean by R0?

Indeed, it might be so. I do not know. I am just struck by seeing the map how it is. I do not know.

My comments should not be read as medical or health advice. There is some information about R0 at https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70863 (Page 15 of the document).

For the amounts of money.

I understand no attendant to IETF Vancouver was not reimbursed; or they are all about to get reimbursed. (I think?)

From what I understand, there was a full refund. People familiar with budgeting might look at the matter from other angles.

For the sources of money. Currently several sources of money are being made available to compensate to many things, such as tele-work, or 'partial no-work' and many others. There are specific budgets to SMEs as well. At a high level, China claimed injecting 130M dollar (milliard, i.e. billion in English); America talked about 50, France about 15 or so. Other countries too. These numbers are non negligible.

The numbers which you mentioned might be non-negligible. It is difficult to translate that into quick impact on daily life.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux