Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1

I do not see us returning to normality until 110.

Stewart

Sent from my iPad

> On 13 Mar 2020, at 18:00, Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>>> One choice is to entirely ignore 107 for the purposes of NomCom
>>> eligibility.  
>> That'd be fine, probably as good or better than any other answer.
> 
> and when 108, 109, ... are remote?
> 
> as i just said privately to someone
> 
> i suspect, similar to the A/V technology, we will need to develop
> attendance taking technology.
> 
> randy
> 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux