Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1

An exhaustive mathematical analysis performed by staring at the two option
paragraps for 5 seconds each has made me come up with the following preference.

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:43:34AM -0400, Barry Leiba wrote:
> One choice is to entirely ignore 107 for the purposes of NomCom
> eligibility.  The last five meetings would then be 106, 105, 104, 103,
> and 102, and one would have had to attend three of those to be
> eligible this year.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux