Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-03-13, at 15:21, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Since,
> formally, IETF 107 is going ahead as virtual, why not count
> virtual attendance as "attendance”.

(That was pretty much what I was trying to say.)
I.e., for each IETF, the “most engaged” version of attending substitutes for physical attendance, if the latter is not available.

Advantage: We don’t work on outdated data
Disadvantage: It’s easier to fake
(But that’s just one out of 3.)

Grüße, Carsten





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux