On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 6:58 AM Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2020, Barry Leiba wrote:
> One choice is to entirely ignore 107 for the purposes of NomCom
> eligibility. The last five meetings would then be 106, 105, 104, 103,
> and 102, and one would have had to attend three of those to be
> eligible this year.
This makes sense to me.
> Another choice is to consider 107 to be a meeting that everyone has
> attended
This makes no sense to me.
I concur with Paul. Ignoring 107 seems to do the best job at fulfilling the spirit of the rule.
-Ekr
Paul
