+1
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 8:51 AM Lars Eggert <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
On 2020-3-13, at 15:43, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For convenient reference, the current rules for an IETF participant to
> be eligible to be a voting member of a NomCom (Section 4.14 of RFC
> 8713) require attendance in person at three of the last five meetings.
.....
> The IESG would like the community’s input: How do *you* think 107
> should be treated in regards to NomCom eligibility?
.....
> One choice is to entirely ignore 107 for the purposes of NomCom
> eligibility.
since we canceled 107, ignoring it (as you outline above) seems the obvious approach? I might be missing something, but I don't understand how that is not the obvious answer.
Thanks,
Lars
