Hi, On 2020-3-13, at 15:43, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For convenient reference, the current rules for an IETF participant to > be eligible to be a voting member of a NomCom (Section 4.14 of RFC > 8713) require attendance in person at three of the last five meetings. .... > The IESG would like the community’s input: How do *you* think 107 > should be treated in regards to NomCom eligibility? .... > One choice is to entirely ignore 107 for the purposes of NomCom > eligibility. since we canceled 107, ignoring it (as you outline above) seems the obvious approach? I might be missing something, but I don't understand how that is not the obvious answer. Thanks, Lars
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
