Hi Joel,
At 05:19 PM 12-03-2020, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
SM, I have trouble understanding the question you are asking.
During and after the IETF LC, questions were asked about the
document. Being proactive, the WG (authors and chairs) have been
proactive in addressing the questions (many from the IESG). This
seems to be not only appropriate, but highly desirable. Given that
the WG has been copied on the emails about the topics and changes,
if the WG objects they can speak up.
What is it you are objecting to?
I asked a question about whether there was a step after the end of
the Last Call and the (beginning) of the IESG Evaluation. That is
not related to the discussion between the Working Group author(s) and
IESG members. In case it got missed, I submitted comments on the
Last Call. Mr Rescorla responded on one point. There were other
points in my comments. I didn't see any response to that from the
Working Group.
I phrased the followed questions as simple as possible so that there
is less room for misunderstanding at the other end: Who assesses
whether the objection is valid or not? Who speaks on behalf of the
Working Group?
I skipped over the "patently false" comment so as to avoid the usual
IETF unpleasantness.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
