On 25 Jan 2020, at 7:41, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
Why do you think a new IESG statement is better than an RFC. The only difference I can see is that it leaves the IESG an out. Which seems to me to be the wrong answer. This issue ought not, it seems to me, be one of IESG judgment.
If you distrust the IESG so deeply about their process, you should probably distrust them on calling a rough consensus.
I do think that having an RFC is a good thing, but for a different reason: until Russ posted his message, none of us would have thought to look in the IESG statements archive to see if anything applied. We look to RFCs.
--Paul Hoffman -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
