Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2845bis-?? Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 2020-01-21 IETF LC End Date: 2020-01-21 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This document was well written and easy read. I found no complaints. There are bogus IDNits warnings for "non-RFC2606-compliant FQDNs". Major issues: None. Minor issues: None. Nits/editorial comments: 1) The sentence in lines 248-250 was hard to parse in the first few reads. I suggest rewording... somehow. It was like this in RFC2845 already, though. 248 If hosts A.site.example and B.example.net share a key, 249 possibilities for the key name include <id>.A.site.example, 250 <id>.B.example.net, and <id>.A.site.example.B.example.net. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
