On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:29:29AM -0800, Eric Rescorla <ekr@xxxxxxxx> wrote a message of 181 lines which said: > > It means a standards compliant DoT implementation will have no > > client identifiers, a standards compliant DoH implementation is > > free to (and likely) to include them. > > > > [Citation needed] I'm not sure I understand your remark. Do you mean that Sara's sentence should be backed up with specific references? I mean, since DoH is HTTP and HTTP (unlike DNS) has a lot of headers that, together, can identify a client, is it enough to reference HTTP RFCs to support the claim? -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
