On 1/9/20, 9:49 AM, "ietf on behalf of Stewart Bryant" <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > A compromise might be to require confidential disclosure to some trusted party that monitors recusal, but the even that is potentially subject to abuse through soft power. [JL] The approach the IETF LLC took was to have disclosure to the board and then the board decides whether any info should be redacted before publishing (if the discloser has asked for it). In the IAB example, the parallel would be confidential disclosure to the IAB itself (rather than to a 3rd party).
