Hello Al Many thanks for your review! Please see below: > This is the OPS-DIR review of -12 > 1) "This specification introduces a new token called a cryptographic > identifier (Crypto-ID) that is used to prove indirectly the ownership > of an address that is being registered by means of [RFC8505]." > during Neighbor Discovery in > "...a 6LoWPAN Low Power Lossy > Network (LLN), typically a stub network connected to a larger IP > network via a Border Router called a 6LBR per [RFC6775]." Unsure what you expectation is here? I removed the redefinition of LLN in the latter piece. > 2) This seems like a worthwhile update to RFC8505. > The section describing the Update aspect is helpful, but ... > Nit: there should also a sentence in the Abstract indicating the Update > status. > The scope of operation is very limited, hence no operational issues detected. The first sentence of the abstract says " This document specifies an extension to 6LoWPAN Neighbor Discovery (ND) protocol defined in RFC6775 and updated in RFC8505. " Should we reword ? Maybe " This document updates the 6LoWPAN Neighbor Discovery (ND) protocol defined in RFC 6775 and RFC 8505. " ? > 3) The SEC-DIR review will likely be more interesting: this reviewer's experience > doesn't foster review of LLN in any depth. It is happening right now : ) > 4) The Doc Shepherd's form indicates that the last 4 versions benefited from > review by > knowledgeable persons in the Security Area. Yes, that helped a lot make the SEC DIR review smoother. Many thanks again Pascal -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
