Re: [ietf-smtp] IETF Policy on dogfood consumption or avoidance - SMTP version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>    We may have to explicitly embed this clause in the protocol:  
>          A "MUST NOT" protocol element MAY be overridden with "550" Policies.
    
Bleh. We often say "we're not the protocol police."

I think it's always clear that local policy can override.

Is the IETF going to come and arrest it's own website?





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux