Re: [Last-Call] [art] Tsvart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 3 Dec 2019, at 3:45 pm, Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Mark,
> 
>> On Dec 2, 2019, at 2:59 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> There is one significant issue related to this document that needs to be
>>> addressed before it can proceed. There is an outstanding errata from RFC7320
>>> that remains unresolved. The BCP index, markings in the datatracker for these
>>> RFCs, and citations in this document are not aligned; that should be corrected
>>> (in all three places) so the appropriate citation in this document does not
>>> further propagate the error.
>> 
>> Yes - caught earlier and already fixed in source.
> 
> That fixes one of the three issues; there are two others. Is anyone fixing those?
> 
> (i.e., the BCP index and RFC metadata do not agree with each other).

Good question; I'm not sure. I noticed it in <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/b43r1IdU7DYPFY8yKbq2kEHTn-0>, but haven't heard anything more; CC:ing Heather and Henrik for guidance.

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux