Hi Joe, Thanks for the review. Responses below. > On 3 Dec 2019, at 2:02 am, Joseph Touch via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Joseph Touch > Review result: Ready with Issues > > This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's > ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written > primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's > authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF > discussion list for information. > > When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this > review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC > tsv-art@xxxxxxxx if you reply to or forward this review. > > There are no transport issues in this document. > > The document would benefit from an explanation as to the reason for the need > for this revision and a summary of the differences with the version it > replaces, even if only in an appendix. I agree, will add one. > There is one significant issue related to this document that needs to be > addressed before it can proceed. There is an outstanding errata from RFC7320 > that remains unresolved. The BCP index, markings in the datatracker for these > RFCs, and citations in this document are not aligned; that should be corrected > (in all three places) so the appropriate citation in this document does not > further propagate the error. Yes - caught earlier and already fixed in source. Thanks again, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
