Skickat från min iPhone > 7 nov. 2019 kl. 02:49 skrev Nico Williams <nico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 11:54:59AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> Here's a thought experiment. >> >> Update the standards process such that the approval of Proposed Standard >> RFCs, after an IETF last call including some specified cross-area review >> requirements, is done by the WG consensus process with the consent of the AD . >> >> Why would that work? Because it now incents the WG chairs by making them, >> in effect, where the buck stops. So the WG chairs and AD (typically >> a committee of three) will feel the obligation to get everything >> right. And it scales. > > So, no more IESG review? What would we need the IESG for anymore? It > would be gone, I guess? > > Sure, it will scale better. But quality will suffer. > Why do you think that would be the case? >> [...]. So the WG chairs and AD (typically a committee of three) [...] > > Typically one of the ADs is uninvolved with a WG for which the other is > responsible, so that would be a committee of two, not three. > > Nico > -- >
