Erik, thanks for your review. Dhruv, thanks for addressing Erik’s comments. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Aug 28, 2019, at 2:54 AM, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Erik, > > Thank you for your review and suggestions. We will update in the next revision. > > Thanks! > Dhruv > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 7:28 AM Erik Kline via Datatracker > <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Reviewer: Erik Kline >> Review result: Ready with Nits >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just >> like any other last call comments. >> >> For more information, please see the FAQ at >> >> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-10 >> Reviewer: Erik Kline >> Review Date: 2019-08-27 >> IETF LC End Date: 2019-08-28 >> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat >> >> Summary: >> >> Gentle reminder for the authors to double-check all the lower case "should"s, >> "required"s, and "must not"s (etc) to make sure it's not important that they be >> capitalized (since the case-sensitive requirements text is referenced). >> >> Major issues: >> >> Minor issues: >> >> Nits/editorial comments: >> >> There are some periodic grammatical changes that I think would be nice, but I >> assume that can get sorted out with the RFC editor. >> >> Two random things I'll note: >> >> Section 1> I can't find "Path Control Element" in RFC 5440. Should this be >> "Path Computation Element"? >> >> Section 5.2> >> . s/speaker wish to disable/speaker wishes to disable/ >> . s/of same type/of the same type/ >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
