Mike, (but also addressing John): On 14/09/2019 00:51, Mike StJohns wrote: > If Adrian will be reappointed regardless of the result of the review, > then there’s no obvious reason for gathering review material > between now and the expiration of the new appointment period. Huh? Gathering, anonymising and providing feedback seems like a fairly obvious and entirely normal reason to me. Doing that every couple of years regardless of whatever else is going on also seems entirely unremarkable to me too. Honestly folks - those of you suspicious of the IAB and all our doings don't need to be quite so concerned. It is just not the case that everything the IAB does is shrouded in one of scheming or ineptitude;-) I say that as an IAB member who does think the IAB has variously messed up recently. I can say that there have been no IAB discussions at all that I could see leading to any chance whatsoever that we cause the same kind of bad outcome as happened with the RSE. Does that help assuage any suspicions or worries? Cheers, S.
Attachment:
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
