It sounds like you disagree with the IAB / RSOC's decision to hire
someone who would be responsible for some aspects of the RSE role but
not for all such aspects.
If you do not believe the IAB / RSOC has the right / responsibility /
permissions needed to do that, then it would seem we have a more basic
problem than Mike's rewrite of the SoW.
(I have lots of disagreements with recent RSOC decisions. This happens
to be one where I think the IAB and the RSOC have made the best of a bad
set of choices.)
Yours,
Joel
On 9/10/2019 6:08 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>Even if one disagrees with the content of RFC 6635 (which we probably
all do, in different ways), there are other, non-Informational documents
that specify how to replace it with something that has community
consensus. And this ain’t it.
Agree. We have a process/mechanism. One of the worst things we could do
is ignore it because “this time it’s different”
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
