Thanks so much for the review, Michael. I like your suggestions and hope the authors will incorporate them into the pending revised I-D, before I send the document to IESG Evaluation. Barry On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 1:51 PM Michael Tüxen via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Michael Tüxen > Review result: Ready with Nits > > This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's > ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written > primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's > authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF > discussion list for information. > > When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this > review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC > tsv-art@xxxxxxxx if you reply to or forward this review. > > I have not identified any transport related issues. > > To improve readability, you might want to > * resolve acronyms on first occurence like CDN, CDNI,... > * Remove section 1.1, since the introduced abbreviations are not used in the text. > * add a graphical representation of the involved nodes and the messages being exchanged between them > > Typos: > * Section 3: the uCDN provide a fallback -> the uCDN provides a fallback > * Section 6: Nir B. Sopher -> Nir B. Sopher (no double space after period) > * Section 6: Kevin J. Ma -> Kevin J. Ma (no double space after period) >
