On 8/31/19 7:54 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
More important RFC 3005 clearly calls out "Discussion of IETF administrative policies" as an appropriate posting topic and this discussion is very much about administrative policies.
By that logic, IANAPLAN, MTGVENUE, and IASA2 discussion should have taken place here, and redirecting them to their respective working group mailing lists would have been misguided. Would you have raised the same objection?
/a
