Reviewer: Joe Clarke Review result: Ready I have been requested to review this draft on behalf of the OPS Directorate. This draft describes PCEP extensions for MPLS-TE LSP automatic bandwidth adjustment with stateful PCE. In general, I think the draft is well-written, and I appreciate the addition of the operational considerations section. It is in that section I have a couple of comments. In section 6.2 you say: A Management Information Base (MIB) module for modeling PCEP is described in [RFC7420]. However, one may prefer the mechanism for configuration using YANG data model [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-yang]. However, when you look at that MIB module, there is only one read-write object. On top of that, the IESG has mandated that new MIB modules should not have read-write objects. I think your language pointing one to the YANG module should be stronger. Perhaps: A MIB module for gathering operational information about PCEP is defined in [RFC7420]. Additionally, the YANG module defined in [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-yang] provides for both configuration of PCEP as well as operational management. === In section 6.6, do you have any more concrete recommendations on a reasonable limit of LSPs with auto-bandwidth that you have discovered from testing or operational experience? Providing some data here may prove useful, even if it is somewhat anecdotal.
