Hi all, I reviewed the messages in this thread and there do not seem to be any changes required for the document to proceed through IESG evaluation. Regards, Alissa > On Jul 8, 2019, at 9:48 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The IESG has received a request from the IETF Administrative Support Activity > 2 WG (iasa2) to consider the following document: - 'The IETF-ISOC > Relationship' > <draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis-05.txt> as Informational RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2019-08-05. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This document summarises the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) - > Internet Society (ISOC) relationship, following a major revision to > the structure of the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA) in > 2018. The IASA was revised under a new "IASA 2.0" structure by the > IASA2 Working Group, which changed the IETF's administrative, legal, > and financial structure. As a result, it also changed the > relationship between the IETF and ISOC, which made it necessary to > revise RFC 2031. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > >
