Thanks Martin and Mahesh. I believe we should add a mandatory statement to the choic (speaking as BFD YANG co-author,) Just created https://github.com/bfd-wg Regards, Reshad. On 2019-08-19, 2:45 PM, "Mahesh Jethanandani" <mjethanandani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: [Adding the authors of BFD YANG module] Martin brings up a good point. But since the document that contains ietf-bfd-types is sitting in RFC Ed Queue, this will have to go into a bis document. Chairs, could you create a bfd-wg in GitHub for us to track this as an issue to be fixed as part of a bis document? > On Aug 19, 2019, at 4:29 AM, Martin Björklund via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Martin Björklund > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I have reviewed this document from a YANG model perspective only. > > My only comment is actually for a grouping defined in ietf-bfd-type, but used > in this module. There is a choice "interval-config-type": > > +--rw unsolicited {bfd-unsol:unsolicited-params-global}? > +--rw enable? boolean > +--rw local-multiplier? multiplier > +--rw (interval-config-type)? > +--:(tx-rx-intervals) > | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval? uint32 > | +--rw required-min-rx-interval? uint32 > +--:(single-interval) {single-minimum-interval}? > +--rw min-interval? uint32 > > This choice is not mandatory and doesn't have a default case, so the question > is what happens if no nodes from the choice has been configured? I would > expect the choice to have a default case (but this then would apply to > ietf-bfd-types, not this document.) > > Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanandani@xxxxxxxxx
