Hi Stewart, Thanks for the prompt review. We will wait for a few more reviews and publish a fixed document. Many thanks, Rick > -----Original Message----- > From: manet [mailto:manet-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant > via Datatracker > Sent: 06 August 2019 10:04 > To: gen-art@xxxxxxxx > Cc: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension.all@xxxxxxxx; manet@xxxxxxxx; > ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: [manet] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid- > extension-05 > > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-05 > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review Date: 2019-08-06 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-08-15 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: A well written document with a few nits that should be looked at.. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > > " The Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) [RFC8175] describes a" > > Nits says that the "[]" brackets should be removed > > ========== > > " None of the features introduced by this extension require extra > consideration by an implementation." > > I think that should be > > "None of the features introduced by this extension require extra > security consideration by an implementation." > > ============== > > "Assign a new DLEP Extensions Registry value (TBD1) from the" > > I think that should be > > "Assign a new DLEP Extensions Type Values Registry value (TBD1) from the" > > ============== > > > > _______________________________________________ > manet mailing list > manet@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
