Hi Mike, On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 04:16:07PM -0400, Michael StJohns wrote: > Hi Alissa - > > Pruned - other comments in line. Also pruning... > On 7/31/2019 2:34 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote: > > > > By contrast, Portia was not an employee of ISOC. She was a contractor to ISOC before the IETF LLC was created, and is now a contractor to the IETF LLC, under your definition of “contractor/consultant.” > > Given that Portia is acting or interim (I don't actually remember which > at this point), I don't know that her contractor status matters all that > much or means anything for the future RSE or even for the future IAD. > > What's a lot more interesting is what you (singular and I*) see as the > target relationship for the to-be-hired permanent IAD - contract with > LLC, employee of the LLC, contract with the IAD's employing > organization, something else? As a potentially implicated party, do you see "I*" as just referring to IETF LLC, or to the IESG, IAB, and potentially other bodies whose names start with I? Thanks, Ben
