Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 6/7/19 8:24 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>> What I'm suggesting is that regardless of our decision on the
>> meetings in US, we as IETF consider this as something acceptable?
> IETF 102 was scheduled to be in SF but moved to Montreal. I
> think it's too soon to know what the situation is going to be
> in 2021.
But, it cost like $160K(%) to cancel, and we should have thought about whether
or not to move IETF111 at the same time.
I want to point out to Klensin and others that the difficulties with getting
a timely VISA to the US started prior to 2016.
(%)-actually, we (ISOC) have a credit that we can spend on a new reservation
as long as we book prior to August 2020, for something that is
prior to 2030 or something like that.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
