Re: virtual-only wgs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Thursday, May 16, 2019 19:59 -0400 Keith Moore
<moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>...
> p.s. However, IMO, a WG that only held interim face-to-face
> meetings, but NOT at IETF meetings, would at the very least be
> acting in bad faith.   (In the distant past I knew of one WG
> that was explicitly doing this as a way to avoid having to
> educate, or answer to, the broader community.)

In the distant past, the IESG would not allow a WG that was not
meeting at IETF meetings to hold f2f interims.  The reason was
closely linked to your concern about bad faith.  Then, IIR, it
became "no f2f interims within some number of weeks before or
after and IETF meeting" to avoid or mitigate the same problem.
I gather that rule has eroded as well.

So, yes.

   john








[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux