Hello, the email of Thomas Schäfer from 24.10.2018 to calsify@xxxxxxxx was not tackled. For this particular document too many things need to repeated, in order to get attention. > The following properties are defined in this specification Colon afterwards? Regards Дилян On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 09:07 -0700, The IESG wrote: > The IESG has received a request from the Calendaring Extensions WG (calext) > to consider the following document: - 'Event Publishing Extensions to > iCalendar' > <draft-ietf-calext-eventpub-extensions-12.txt> as Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2019-04-29. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This specification updates RFC5545 by introducing a number of new > iCalendar properties and components which are of particular use for > event publishers and in social networking. > > This specification also defines a new STRUCTURED-DATA property for > iCalendar RFC5545 to allow for data that is directly pertinent to an > event or task to be included with the calendar data. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-eventpub-extensions/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-eventpub-extensions/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > calsify mailing list > calsify@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify