Re: 118

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Le 17/04/2019 à 15:39, Joel M. Halpern a écrit :
Trimmed.

On 4/17/19 3:46 AM, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
...

I propose the following:
OLD:
      A randomized Interface ID has the same characteristics of a
      randomized MAC address, except the length in bits.  A MAC
      address SHOULD be of length 48 decimal.  An Interface ID
      SHOULD be of length 64 decimal for all types of IPv6
      addresses.  In the particular case of IPv6 link-local
      addresses, the length of the Interface ID MAY be 118
      decimal.

NEW:
      A randomized Interface ID has the same characteristics of a
      randomized MAC address, except the length in bits.  A MAC
      address SHOULD be of length 48 decimal.  An Interface ID
      SHOULD be of length specified in other documents.

Do you disagree?

"SHOULD be of a length specified in other documents" wihtout any reference to what the other documents are or how to find them seems like a recipe for implementor error.  Can we be somewhat more specific?

One could be more specific about which document. There is some individual work item (not a WG item) in 6man that one could point to. A reference to a non WG item will not delay this document?

Or, rather, should I propose a new formulation above which just keeps:

NEW:
      A randomized Interface ID has the same characteristics of a
      randomized MAC address.

Alex




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux