Thank you for the comments. I have some questions:
On 4/8/19 2:37 AM, Zitao Wang via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Zitao Wang
Review result: Has Issues
Summary: This memo defines the Session Description Protocol (SDP). SDP is
intended for describing multimedia sessions for the purposes of session
announcement, session invitation, and other forms of multimedia session
initiation. This document obsoletes RFC 4566. I think the document make sense
and is written very clear, except some small nits:
# In Section 5, there are
several terms that miss references, such as "US-ASCII subset of UTF-8", "ASN.1
or XDR", etc.
There is already a reference to the definition of UTF-8 [RFC3629] in
section 4.5. Do you think the reference needs to be included with every
use? The US-ASCII subset of UTF-8 is also defined in RFC3629, so I am
inclined to use the same reference for that. There are also a couple of
uses of US-ASCII without mention of UTF-8. I'm inclined to change those
to "the US-ASCII subset of UTF-8".
Regarding ASN.1 and XDR, I can add references if you think it important.
But their use is very peripheral, and it isn't necessary to know what
they are to read the text.
# s/session- specific/session-specific/
Regarding "session- specific" vs. "session-specific":
The context for this is:
"Attribute scopes in addition to media- and session- specific may also..."
The space was intentional so that there are equivalent constructions for
"media" and "session". The intent is as a shorthand for:
"Attribute scopes in addition to media-specific and session-specific may
also..."
To avoid confusion I think I'll just change to the latter.
# Suggest to add tags on
"overview optional items" to identified now-obsolete items, such as "a=cat",
"a=keywds", "k=".
I'm not clear what you want me to do. I guess you are suggesting adding
something to the first figure in section 5.
I don't see how that would be possible for a=cat and a=keywds, since the
figure doesn't mention individual attributes. While it is possible to
add something for k=, IMO it is better to leave that level of detail to
the complete description in section 5.12.
Thanks,
Paul Kyzivat
