Re: The "decline of the true believers in the IETF" graph

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephen,

> On Apr 8, 2019, at 3:21 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 08/04/2019 22:59, Keith Moore wrote:
>> 80% seems like a high threshold, probably more indicative of "is paid to
>> work as a standards-body 'goer'" than "true believer".
>> 
>> Given the variety of locations in which IETF meets. it can be hard for
>> anyone to get to 80% of them.   But I'd be curious about how many
>> attendees get to one out of three meetings, and how many get to two out
>> of three.  Or maybe just a bar graph of how many attendees attended 1,
>> 2, 3, ... N out of the last N meetings?
> I'm not that fussed myself about these numbers (though a
> decline in regular attendees, if real, is interesting).
> 
> But, if someone does put in effort here, please do count
> and publish the numbers who are nomcom-eligible. If that
> number is changing, then it'd be good for the community
> to know.

That’s a good point, and a better metric than some of the others being discussed.

Bob

> 
> Thanks,
> S.
> 
>> 
>> Keith
>> 
>> 
>> 
> <0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc>





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux