Hi Keith,
At 01:44 PM 31-03-2019, Keith Moore wrote:
I also prefer "fair" countermeasures against attacks on IETF - which
I would define to mean countermeasures that don't discriminate in
favor or against one kind of contributor over another, while still
allowing IETF to function effectively.
There is a new version of the draft at
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moonesamy-recall-rev-01 The last
paragraph of Section 2.2 discusses "fair" with respect to RFC 2026.
One of the definitions of "discriminate" (O.E.D) is: "Make an unjust
or prejudicial distinction in the treatment of different categories
of people, especially on the grounds of race, sex, or age". What if
the IESG discriminates against anyone in one of those categories of
participants? That is covered, indirectly, in Section 3.2 of the
draft. In my opinion, those procedures could have an impact on
allowing the IETF to function effectively. However, that is not what
this draft is about.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
