Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready I read the document and think it is ready. IDNits warnings and comments are easily/automatically fixed when new version is submitted. I only have few editorial nits/suggestions. * Section 5.1 says "Assuming the below specified network topology.." while it could also use an exact reference to Figure 1. * Section 5 is written so that it assumed the reader has already read Section 6. Maybe swapping Sections 5 and 6 order would make sense?
