On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:42 AM Christian Hopps <chopps@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Andy Bierman <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I strongly agree that a prefix SHOULD be present, not MUST be present.
> I also think the 3 standard prefixes will be insufficient over time.
> (Having every organization on the planet except IETF share the prefix
> "vendor:"
> seems a bit short-sighted)
Sounds like you are a strong supporter of the included prefixes registry as well then. :)
not really -- in my server implementation the prefix is ignored -- it is just part of
a unique string. It is supposed to help clients create unique tags.
It is subjective whether vendor:bbf-routing is better than bbf:routing (for example)
Andy
Thanks,
Chris.
>
>
> Andy
