Re: [netmod] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:42 AM Christian Hopps <chopps@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Andy Bierman <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I strongly agree that a prefix SHOULD be present, not MUST be present.
> I also think the 3 standard prefixes will be insufficient over time.
> (Having every organization on the planet except IETF share the prefix
> "vendor:"
> seems a bit short-sighted)

Sounds like you are a strong supporter of the included prefixes registry as well then. :)

not really -- in my server implementation the prefix is ignored -- it is just part of
a unique string. It is supposed to help clients create unique tags.
It is subjective whether vendor:bbf-routing is better than bbf:routing (for example)

Andy

 

Thanks,
Chris.

>
>
> Andy

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux