Re: Adi Shamir denied entry to the US

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We do the best we can.  MeetEcho works well enough for exceptions.  

Maybe someday we'll do pure-virtual meetings, sidestepping some 
issues while introducing others.  Where in the balance of things are
we now?

As a thought experiment, what if there were only one physical meeting
per year, mostly just so folks can shake hands, but then *scheduled* 
(and completely deconflicted) per WG virtual meetings throughout the
year?  Would there be balance in that?

Just an idle thought.  No need to reply.

Kent


> On Mar 7, 2019, at 12:01 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> You assume, of course, that, sometime after 29 March, UK
> citizens are not required to go through a visa application
> process involving appearing in person at a consulate in order to
> visit Germany or the EU more generally.  Of course, I think the
> odds of that are extremely small, but I would have given almost
> as poor odds to Shamir being denied permission to come to the US
> (or several other visa denials or timeouts I know about).
> 
> As several people have pointed out, things can change and change
> quickly.   Even if we could predict such changes, for any
> country or situation requiring that visas be issued before the
> traveler gets on a plane, I know of no way to prevent or predict
> when some arbitrary junior consular official will have a bad day
> and decide to prove that he (or she or it) is powerful enough to
> come up with an excuse (if that is even needed) to deny a visa
> or lose the application for someone, possibly someone important.
> 
> 
> That is the one thing I would have added to Eliot's excellent
> and very helpful note:  Until we figure out a way to keep people
> who are stupid and/or petty out of consular jobs (or government
> jobs generally), some visa processing timeouts (and maybe even a
> few rejections) are going to happen and happen nearly at random.
> A decision to block a country as a meeting site had best be done
> on the basis of patterns rather than isolated incidents, no
> matter how much publicity those incidents draw or how irrational
> they appear.  FWIW, the Canada-Chine behavior looks like a
> pattern to me.  Trump's travel ban on a list of countries is
> definitely not just a pattern but a matter of stated policy as
> are, e.g., the rules several countries have adopted toward
> Israeli passports and visa applications.  This thing with
> Shamir?  Silly bordering on stupid, definitely.  But no evidence
> of a pattern on which it would be sensible to start moving
> meetings around, at least yet.  
> 
> best,
>   john
> 
> 
> --On Thursday, March 7, 2019 15:42 +0000 Christer Holmberg
> <christer.holmberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Berlin. 
>> 
>> 
> 伀渀  㜀⼀ ㌀⼀㈀ ㄀㤀Ⰰ ㄀㜀⸀㐀 Ⰰ ∀椀攀琀昀 漀渀 戀攀栀愀氀昀 漀昀 匀琀攀瀀栀愀渀 圀攀渀最攀爀∀ഀ਀㸀 㰀椀攀琀昀ⴀ戀漀甀渀挀攀猀䀀椀攀琀昀⸀漀爀最 漀渀 戀攀栀愀氀昀 漀昀 猀琀攀眀攀䀀猀琀攀眀攀⸀漀爀最㸀 眀爀漀琀攀㨀ഀ਀㸀 ഀ਀㸀     ⸀⸀⸀⸀ 愀渀搀 椀渀 䌀栀椀渀愀⸀  ⠀倀攀爀栀愀瀀猀 攀瘀攀渀 �
> �漀爀攀 猀漀Ⰰ 挀漀渀猀椀搀攀爀椀渀最ഀ਀㸀 眀栀愀琀✀猀 栀愀瀀瀀攀渀椀渀最 琀漀 挀攀爀琀愀椀渀 䌀愀渀愀搀椀愀渀 挀椀琀椀稀攀渀猀 琀栀攀爀攀⸀⤀ഀ਀㸀 匀琀攀瀀栀愀渀ഀ਀㸀     ഀ਀㸀     ഀ਀㸀     伀渀 ㌀⼀㜀⼀㄀㤀Ⰰ  㜀㨀㌀㈀Ⰰ ∀椀攀琀昀 漀渀 戀攀栀愀氀昀 漀昀 倀愀甀氀 圀漀甀琀攀爀猀∀ഀ਀㸀 㰀�
> �攀琀昀ⴀ戀漀甀渀挀攀猀䀀椀攀琀昀⸀漀爀最 漀渀 戀攀栀愀氀昀 漀昀 瀀愀甀氀䀀渀漀栀愀琀猀⸀挀愀㸀 眀爀漀琀攀㨀     ഀ਀㸀         伀渀 吀栀甀Ⰰ 㜀 䴀愀爀 ㈀ ㄀㤀Ⰰ 䔀氀椀漀琀 䰀攀愀爀 眀爀漀琀攀㨀ഀ਀㸀         ഀ਀㸀         㸀 䠀漀眀攀瘀攀爀☠ഀ਀㸀         㸀 ഀ਀㸀     
>     㸀 吀栀椀猀 挀爀椀琀攀爀椀漀渀 挀愀渀 愀渀搀 栀愀猀 挀漀洀攀 椀渀琀漀 挀漀渀昀氀椀挀琀 眀椀琀栀ഀ਀㸀 漀琀栀攀爀 挀爀椀琀攀爀椀愀Ⰰ 猀甀挀栀 愀猀 攀愀猀攀 漀昀 琀爀愀瘀攀氀 琀漀 琀栀攀 氀漀挀愀氀攀Ⰰ 挀漀猀琀Ⰰഀ਀㸀 愀渀搀 攀瘀攀渀 猀愀昀攀琀礀 愀渀搀 栀攀愀氀琀栀 椀猀猀甀攀猀⸀  䴀椀挀栀愀攀氀�
> �椀猀         㸀ഀ਀㸀 挀漀爀爀攀挀琀 琀栀愀琀 眀攀 挀漀甀氀搀 氀漀猀攀 愀 挀爀攀搀椀琀 昀漀爀 琀栀攀 洀漀瘀攀搀 洀攀攀琀椀渀最Ⰰ 愀渀搀ഀ਀㸀 刀椀挀栀愀爀搀 椀猀 挀漀爀爀攀挀琀 琀栀愀琀 䌀愀渀愀搀愀 栀愀猀 爀攀昀甀猀攀搀 攀渀琀爀礀 琀漀 瀀攀漀瀀氀攀 愀猀ഀ਀㸀 眀攀氀氀⸀  䤀渀搀攀攀搀 愀 搀攀愀�
> � 挀漀氀氀攀愀最甀攀 漀渀 琀栀攀         㸀 䤀䄀䈀 昀爀漀洀 䌀栀椀渀愀ഀ਀㸀 眀愀猀 爀攀昀甀猀攀搀 攀渀琀爀礀 愀琀 漀渀攀 瀀漀椀渀琀⸀ 䤀渀 愀搀搀椀琀椀漀渀Ⰰ 椀琀 椀猀 漀昀琀攀渀 栀愀爀搀ഀ਀㸀 昀漀爀 猀漀洀攀 椀洀洀椀最爀愀渀琀猀 眀栀漀 氀攀愀瘀攀 愀 挀漀甀渀琀爀礀 琀漀 爀攀攀渀琀攀爀⸀  吀栀
> 攀 䤀䄀匀䄀ഀ਀㸀 栀愀猀 琀漀 琀愀欀攀 愀氀氀 漀昀 琀栀椀猀         㸀 椀渀琀漀 愀挀挀漀甀渀琀⸀ഀ਀㸀         㸀 ഀ਀㸀         㸀 䄀猀 琀漀 挀漀洀洀甀渀椀琀礀 昀攀愀爀猀 愀渀搀 挀漀渀挀攀爀渀猀Ⰰ 椀昀 眀攀 搀漀渀✀琀 最漀ഀ਀㸀 琀漀 琀栀攀 唀⸀匀⸀ 愀琀 愀氀氀Ⰰ 琀栀攀渀 眀攀�
> �眀椀氀氀 栀愀瘀攀 渀漀 搀愀琀愀 漀渀 樀甀猀琀 栀漀眀 眀攀ഀ਀㸀 愀爀攀 愀昀昀攀挀琀攀搀⸀  圀栀椀氀攀 琀栀攀爀攀 愀爀攀 漀琀栀攀爀 挀漀渀昀攀爀攀渀挀攀猀         㸀ഀ਀㸀 昀爀漀洀 眀栀漀猀攀 攀砀瀀攀爀椀攀渀挀攀 眀攀 挀愀渀 愀渀搀 搀漀 戀攀渀攀昀椀琀Ⰰ 琀栀攀 搀攀洀漀最爀愀瀀栀椀挀ഀ਀㸀 漀昀 攀�
> �挀栀 挀漀洀洀甀渀椀琀礀 椀猀 猀氀椀最栀琀氀礀 搀椀昀昀攀爀攀渀琀⸀  䤀琀✀猀 椀洀瀀漀爀琀愀渀琀 琀漀ഀ਀㸀 欀渀漀眀 栀漀眀 洀愀渀礀 瀀攀漀瀀氀攀 眀攀爀攀 搀攀渀椀攀搀 愀挀挀攀猀猀         㸀 琀漀 愀ഀ਀㸀 挀漀甀渀琀爀礀⸀  䤀 攀渀挀漀甀爀愀最攀 琀栀攀 挀漀洀洀甀渀椀琀礀 琀漀 爀攀昀氀攀挀琀 漀渀 
> 琀栀攀 渀甀洀戀攀爀猀ഀ਀㸀 愀猀 愀渀搀 眀栀攀渀 琀栀攀礀 戀攀挀漀洀攀 愀瘀愀椀氀愀戀氀攀 昀爀漀洀 琀栀攀 ㈀ ㈀㄀ 匀愀渀 䘀爀愀渀挀椀猀挀漀ഀ਀㸀 洀攀攀琀椀渀最Ⰰ 渀漀琀 琀漀 洀攀渀琀椀漀渀 愀氀氀 琀栀攀         㸀 漀琀栀攀爀 洀攀攀琀椀渀最猀 椀渀ഀ਀㸀 漀琀栀攀爀 挀漀甀渀琀爀椀攀猀 椀渀 戀攀琀眀�
> �攀渀⸀  䄀渀搀 礀攀猀Ⰰ 愀 氀漀琀 挀愀渀 愀渀搀 眀椀氀氀ഀ਀㸀 挀栀愀渀最攀 戀攀琀眀攀攀渀 渀漀眀 愀渀搀 ㈀ ㈀㄀⸀         ഀ਀㸀         䤀渀搀攀攀搀⸀ 䰀漀漀欀 愀琀 栀漀眀 猀甀搀搀攀渀氀礀 琀栀攀爀攀 椀猀 琀栀椀猀 䌀愀渀愀搀愀 ⴀഀ਀㸀 䌀栀椀渀愀 椀猀猀甀攀Ⰰ 眀栀椀挀栀        �
> �洀椀最栀琀 猀琀爀漀渀最氀礀 愀昀昀攀挀琀 漀甀爀 洀攀攀琀椀渀最猀ഀ਀㸀 猀挀栀攀搀甀氀攀搀 椀渀 䌀愀渀愀搀愀⸀         ഀ਀㸀         倀愀甀氀ഀ਀㸀         ഀ਀㸀         ഀ਀㸀     ഀ਀㸀     ഀ਀㸀 ഀ਀ഀ਀ഀ਀ഀ਀
> 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux