Hello,
At 07:50 AM 3/4/2019, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the IETF Administrative Support Activity
2 WG (iasa2) to consider the following document: - 'Structure of the IETF
Administrative Support Activity, Version 2.0'
<draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08.txt> as Best Current Practice
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2019-03-18. Exceptionally, comments may be
Section 4.7 explains that a reasonable period to respond to a request
for review is typically 90 days. That is a roundabout way to set a
standard for "reasonable period". What is the rationale for setting
such a long period to respond? What prevents it from being used for "OBE"?
In Section 5.2, the role of the Board is defined as being about
ensuring that the strategy and conduct of the IETF LLC is consistent
with IETF's needs. What is the meaning of conduct" in there?
Will the insurance coverage for IETF "decisions-making" be managed by
the IETF LLC?
Why is the LLC given the responsibility to recruit new directors?
What is the meaning of developing the annual budget in an open,
transparent and collaborative manner (Section 7.10)? Will there be a
Last Call before the annual budget is approved by the LLC?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
