On 18.02.2019 18:07, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 9:58 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot@xxxxxxxx
<mailto:mnot@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On 18 Feb 2019, at 1:50 pm, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>> Because, by the time this becomes an RFC, I (the expert of the
registry, IESG still willing), will
>> work with IANA to get that set up. Probably during AUTH48.
>
> It would be nice if that were already done, but I'm good with that
> assurance. Kathleen?
It seemed rash to set up the new process before the document was
approved.
I'll leave it up to the current ADs, but having text that says something
like:
"The instructions included below are the initial set to be used by IANA
and entered on the registry. Subsequent updates will be made directly
to the registry, therefore that set is considered authoritative."
Would be helpful to avoid confusion.
Best regards,
Kathleen
....and mark that section for removal before publication as RFC.
Best regards, Julian
