Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-cdn-loop-01.txt> (CDN Loop Prevention) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Julian,

> On 3 Dec 2018, at 1:51 am, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> s/[RFC7230], Section 5.7.1/Section 5.7.1 of [RFC7230]/
> 
>>   "tracking message forwards, avoiding request loops, and identifying
>>   the protocol capabilities of senders along the request/response
>>   chain."
>>   In theory, Via could be used to identify these loops.  However, in
>>   practice it is not used in this fashion, because some HTTP servers
>>   use Via for other purposes - in particular, some implementations
>>   disable some HTTP/1.1 features when the Via header is present.
> 
> It would be nice if this came with pointers to related bug reports so the reader could have a glance.
> 
>> 2.  The CDN-Loop Request Header Field
>>   CDN-Loop: FooCDN, barcdn; host="foo123.bar.cdn"
>>   CDN-Loop: baz-cdn; abc="123"; def="456", anotherCDN
>>   Note that the token syntax does not allow whitespace, DQUOTE or any
>>   of the characters "(),/:;<=>?@[]{}".  See [RFC7230], Section 3.2.6.
> 
> s/.  See [RFC7230], Section 3.2.6./([RFC7230], Section 3.2.6)./
> 
>>   Likewise, note the rules for when parameter values need to be quoted
>>   in [RFC7231], Section 3.1.1.
> 
> s/[RFC7231], Section 3.1.1/Section 3.1.1 of [RFC7231]/

Is this just personal preference, or is there a reason you suggest this form? I see nothing about it in RFC7322.

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux