> On Nov 25, 2018, at 11:54 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What this doc tries to do is to analyze the possible effects of > different types and options, and only advice to drop them when there is > a clear reason to do so. It claims those actions based on security. This is not a security issue. It is a revenue preservation issue. There is a big difference between using a protocol feature and abusing it. The implication that merely using some of these features is a security issue and an abuse is the problem with this document - and the approach of similar documents. Joe
