Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Would it be appropriate for IETF to issue an RFC that states that
> despite the similarity in names, use of such variants of TLS MUST NOT
> be used to claim compliance with IETF specifications requiring TLS,
> and generally warning the IETF community of deliberate efforts to
> weaken application security?
Can you give me an example of what you mean?
(i.e. "Use "TLS MUST NOT in a sentence" :-)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
