> On Nov 10, 2018, at 6:14 PM, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I would like to start a discussion on the Friday experiment. I, for one, thought that it was a resounding failure. Based on the room reservations in the meeting wiki, there were 8 rooms available on Friday, but only 5 side meetings, most of which were for only an hour or two, which was a huge underutilization of the resources that the IETF was paying for. > > The experiment also had at least two detrimental effects on the IETF agenda: > > - Many WGs had less time than was needed to address the topics or drafts that needed discussion > > - There were a number of unfortunate conficts, expecially in the Routing area. > > My personal hope is that this experiment will not be repeated, and we go back to our previous meeting agenda. I agree for the reasons Andy stated. We had the same issue in 6man (not enough time). We did schedule a meeting on Friday on one topic, but that could have easily been done during the week in the lounge. Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
